>Right - and I can't see any case where saying you will vote A not AB >will cause B voters to vote AB. I'm sure such a case exists - but I >can't find it: hence my question at the end: can you provide one? Poll with A voters voting AB AB 30 (A>B>C) B 30 (B>A>C) C 40 B is projected to win with 60 per cent. if the A voters say they will vote just A A 30 B 30 C 40 B voters will vote AB to stop C from winning.
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voti... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff ... Richard Moore
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Bart Ingles
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
