Blake Cretney wrote: > Some of the reasons that IRV is advocated, which are not simple errors > in reasoning are the following: I'd add simplicity of voting. Because IRV effectively ignores lower preferences, you don't need to vote them or think about them. This makes it a lot easier to vote without being concerned that you're somehow messing it up. This applies to Approval too.
- [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Blake Cretney
- Martin Harper
