election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2001/04/12 [EM] Open primary Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/12 Re: [EM] Some nominations so far Richard Moore
• 2001/04/12 Re: I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re:[EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights Martin Harper
• 2001/04/12 Re: I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights Craig Carey
• 2001/04/11 [EM] Some brief campaign argument MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/11 Re: [EM] 3 choices/5 voters Example Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/11 [EM] Some nominations so far MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/11 [EM] 3 choices/5 voters Example DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/11 Re: [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights Richard Moore
• 2001/04/11 Re: [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores. Richard Moore
• 2001/04/11 Re: I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights Martin Harper
• 2001/04/11 [EM] Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/11 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/11 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/11 I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights Craig Carey
• 2001/04/11 Re: Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/11 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Martin Harper
• 2001/04/11 Re: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Martin Harper
• 2001/04/11 [EM] STV By Meek's Method Martin Harper
• 2001/04/11 [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights Martin Harper
• 2001/04/11 [EM] Duncan Black on Condorcet Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/10 RE: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality LAYTON Craig
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Buddha Buck
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/10 RE: Actual Approval Elections: DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] Actual Approval Elections: Richard Moore
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Buddha Buck
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] Actual Approval Elections: Craig Carey
• 2001/04/10 [EM] output ranking Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/10 Re: Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/10 [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/10 Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/10 RE: Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/10 RE: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings Martin Harper
• 2001/04/10 Re: [EM] Actual Approval Elections: Martin Harper
• 2001/04/10 [EM] Actual Approval Elections: I Like Irving
• 2001/04/09 Re: [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/04/09 [EM] output ranking MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/09 [EM] Craig's rant MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/09 [EM] Five Slot Method Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/09 [EM] Mixed Condorcet-Plurality Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/09 Re: [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/09 Re: [EM] IRV's myopia Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man onevote' rules Martin Harper
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man one vote' rules Rob Lanphier
• 2001/04/08 [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores. Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/08 [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man one vote' rules Craig Carey
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Martin Harper
• 2001/04/08 [EM] Another one-man-one-vote proof Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/08 [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/08 Re: [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a? David Catchpole
• 2001/04/07 [EM] DSV clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] IRV's myopia MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll Richard Moore
• 2001/04/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/06 [EM] 3 it is, then, for tie in designated method. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/06 [EM] IRV's myopia Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/06 Re: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/06 Re: IRV mailing party adventures Martin Harper
• 2001/04/06 Re: [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/06 Re: [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a? David Catchpole
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll Richard Moore
• 2001/04/05 [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll Richard Moore
• 2001/04/05 [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/05 RE: IRV mailing party adventures LAYTON Craig
• 2001/04/05 Re: IRV mailing party adventures (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll Rob LeGrand
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] The Golden Rule of Preferences: Martin Harper
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy Martin Harper
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves" Martin Harper
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] What would Tom impose, and how? Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/05 Re: IRV mailing party adventures Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/05 [EM] The Golden Rule of Preferences: I Like Irving
• 2001/04/05 Re: [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves" Buddha Buck
• 2001/04/05 [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves" I Like Irving
• 2001/04/04 [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 [EM] Voting Systems wins the poll MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy Bart Ingles
• 2001/04/04 Fwd: Re: [EM] Ballot for poll on poll topics MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 Re: IRV mailing party adventures Bart Ingles
• 2001/04/04 [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy LAYTON Craig
• 2001/04/04 Re: IRV mailing party adventures DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] What would Tom impose, and how? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/04 Re: IRV mailing party adventures Martin Harper
• 2001/04/04 Re: Condorcet cyclic drop rule DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/04 RE: IRV mailing party adventures DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/04 Re: [EM] Universal Approval Martin Harper
• 2001/04/04 [EM] Approval for Tom Martin Harper
• 2001/04/03 RE: [EM] IRV mailing party adventures LAYTON Craig
• 2001/04/03 Re: [EM] IRV mailing party adventures Richard Moore
• 2001/04/03 [EM] IRV mailing party adventures Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/03 [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method Martin Harper
• 2001/04/03 RE: [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts: LAYTON Craig
• 2001/04/03 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/03 [EM] Dyadic Approval definition (fourth installment) Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/03 Re: [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts: Martin Harper
• 2001/04/03 [EM] A method that satisfies GSFC, FBC and SDSC. Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/03 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/03 [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts: I Like Irving
• 2001/04/02 RE: A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/02 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Concepts and Reality Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] What would Tom impose, and how? Richard Moore
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore: Richard Moore
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] What would Tom impose, and how? Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/02 RE: Blake's interpretation vs Condorcet's words DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/02 Re: Condorcet cyclic drop rule DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/02 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/02 [EM] What would Tom impose, and how? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Common voting patterns Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/02 [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC Forest Simmons
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval Anthony Simmons
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!] Martin Harper
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore: Martin Harper
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Rob Ritchie of CVD: the fiery divine reforming influencers of US political life Craig Carey
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/02 Re: Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/02 [EM] FWD - Thank You Mister Mike Ossipoff I Like Irving
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore: I Like Irving
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/02 [EM] Blake's interpretation vs Condorcet's words MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/02 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/04/01 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? Richard Moore
• 2001/04/01 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/01 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? DEMOREP1
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Martin Harper
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Martin Harper
• 2001/04/01 [EM] PR/IRV bill in Congress Bart Ingles
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Tom Ruen
• 2001/04/01 Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist! Bart Ingles
• 2001/03/31 RE: Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/31 [EM] Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/31 RE: Condorcet cyclic drop rule DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/31 Re: [EM] Any method can punish truncation Richard Moore
• 2001/03/30 Re: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? Richard Moore
• 2001/03/30 [EM] How I figured my ballot Richard Moore
• 2001/03/30 [EM] Dyadic Approval definition (third installment) Forest Simmons
• 2001/03/30 [EM] Any method can punish truncation MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/30 RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/30 Re: [EM] Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/30 RE: I used an old computer & it deleted program MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/30 RE: [EM] Demorep & Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/30 Re: [EM] Dyadic Approval Martin Harper
• 2001/03/30 Re: [EM] Reply to Layton about the Kansas City Council: Martin Harper
• 2001/03/30 Re: [EM] Delay in finding computer's editor instructions Bart Ingles
• 2001/03/30 [EM] Reply to Layton about the Kansas City Council: I Like Irving
• 2001/03/29 Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Richard Moore
• 2001/03/29 [EM] Delay in finding computer's editor instructions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/03/29 [EM] IRV's majority rule claim Richard Moore
• 2001/03/29 RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
• 2001/03/29 RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
• 2001/03/29 RE: Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/29 [EM] Majority? Expressivity? Strategy? Joe Weinstein
• 2001/03/29 [EM] RE: Unranked ballot election challenge DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/29 Re: [EM] RE: Unranked ballot election challenge Tom Ruen
• 2001/03/29 RE: Condorcet cyclic drop rule DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/29 RE: [EM] Demorep & Approval DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/29 RE: I used an old computer & it deleted program DEMOREP1
• 2001/03/29 [EM] No, you are not a Spoiler: I Like Irving
• 2001/03/29 [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - insincere voting strategy in UIRV Tom Ruen

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]