Dear Michael, you wrote (1 July 2001): > Nanson's method -- which calculates the Borda score for each candidate, > drops the lowest, then recalculates -- can be proven to always find the > Condorcet winner if one exist. It is one of few non-Condorcet methods > with this property. What is a "Condorcet method" due to your use of this term? Markus Schulze
- [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than standard Nan... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Blake Cretney
