Dear participants, due to Condorcet, a "proposition" is a statement of the form: "X is better than Y." An "opinion" is a set of n*(n-1)/2 propositions (one for each pair of candidates). A "possible opinion" is a set of n*(n-1)/2 propositions (one for each pair of candidates) that is compatible to a ranking. An "impossible opinion" is a set of n*(n-1)/2 propositions (one for each pair of candidates) that is incompatible to every ranking. Due to Condorcet, when one "eliminates" a proposition of an opinion then one still has an opinion. Therefore, it is clear that "eliminating" can only mean "inverting". Markus Schulze
- [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than standard Nan... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Michael Rouse
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Is "Inverse Nanson" better than sta... Markus Schulze
