Mr. Cretney wrote- Returning to politics, I don't claim that personal politics inevitably results in more spending. A country can set strict spending limits. It could ban national advertising. But something's got to give. If candidates aren't spending enough money, then voters will be confused. As well, voters are more likely to vote for the incumbent because this is at least a known entity, and there is no effective branding by a national party. ---- D- Limiting info is one of the controls routinely used in tyranny regimes --- Hitler, Stalin, Hirohito, Mao, etc., etc.
What happened to the First Amendment ??? See McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995) (First Amendment right to produce anonymous leaflets) -- via www.findlaw.com Some info will obviously be given out to the supporters of each party/ choice on how to vote *properly* (depending on the poll numbers and the election method being used and the strategy related to such method).
