Donald Davison wrote: > Adam: "I've seen your post (and copy) informative material when speaking on > the subject of multi-winner elections. But so far your posts on the > subject of single winner elections have essentially consisted of talking > down to those who support methods other than IRV." > > Donald: There is a difference. In multi-seat election methods the > corruption lies in which rules are used, in single-seat methods the > corruption lies in which method is used. The ABC methods are corrupt > methods. So, it follows that I would object to corrupt methods with the > same vigor that I object to corrupt rules in STV.
I think that response, and what follows it, proves Adam's point pretty well. -- Richard
