DEMOREP1: I would guess that you have not read the book. It appears that you have found yourself a convenient way of sparing yourself the labor of finding out what Saari actually has to say about the majority criterion. Could it be that the majority criterion is appropriate only in the case of 2 candidates? Is that completely beyond the realm of possibility, or is it a "foregone conclusion" (defined by by _Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary_ as "a conclusion that has preceded argument or examination")?
SB --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > D- Cancelling out votes that are part of a majority (when there are 3 or more > choices) is highly improper (and simplistic). > > Thus -- Saari is full of hot air on the subject. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/
