election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: [EM] A polite spelling correction Narins, Josh
• [EM] Ranked-Pairs, conclusion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] U.S.A. GOVERNMENT - VOTING POWER INEQUALITIES, NOV. 2000 ELECTION DEMOREP1
• [EM] Discussion n.2 Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] A preferential, totally proportional electoral system Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] A preferential, totally proportional electoral system Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Fundraiser for Hager-small correction Alex Small
• [EM] Fund-raiser for Hager Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Fund-raiser for Hager Bart Ingles
• [EM] Automatic redistricting Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Automatic redistricting Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Proportional Representation System with Hare Quotas, revised 23 Mar 2002 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Ranked Pairs, continued MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Proportional Representation System with Hare Quotas DEMOREP1
• [EM] above/below line voting Forest Simmons
• [EM] BASIC PARTS OF THE B.C. GREEN PARTY P.R. PROPOSAL FEB. 2002 DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] BASIC PARTS OF THE B.C. GREEN PARTY P.R. PROPOSAL FEB.2002 Olli Salmi
• Re: Ranked Pairs MIKE OSSIPOFF
• RE: More on Gerrymander prevention DEMOREP1
  • RE: More on Gerrymander prevention DEMOREP1
  • Re: More on Gerrymander prevention Michael Rouse
• re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Michael Rouse
• [EM] Anthony & reductio ad absurdum issue MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Anthony & reductio ad absurdum issue Narins, Josh
• RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Jurij Toplak
  • RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Joe Weinstein
  • RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Adam Tarr
  • RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Lewis Carroll and limited vote Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] Lewis Carroll and limited vote Olli Salmi
  • Re: [EM] Lewis Carroll and limited vote Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Approval-Completed Condorcet vs. Criterion Adam Tarr
• re: Gerrymandering and PR DEMOREP1
• re:[EM] Gerrymandering and PR Alex Small
• Re: WSJ Gerrymander story DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Gerrymandering and PR Adam Tarr
  • re:[EM] Gerrymandering and PR Adam Tarr
  • re:[EM] Gerrymandering and PR Forest Simmons
  • re: [EM] Gerrymandering and PR Adam Tarr
  • RE: [EM] Gerrymandering and PR Narins, Josh
• [EM] Gerrymandering and PR Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Gerrymandering and PR Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] NYTimes.com Article: French Twist: A Fair Way to Pick Oscars? Steve Barney
• [EM] Salus populi suprema lex -- John Locke DEMOREP1
• Re:[EM] Gerrymandering Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Gerrymandering Blake Cretney
• Re:[EM] Gerrymandering Alex Small
• [EM] Zimbabwe Anthony Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Zimbabwe Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Zimbabwe Narins, Josh
• [EM] Working with journalists Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Working with journalists Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Working with journalists Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Working with journalists Anthony Simmons
• RE: [EM] Redistricting Op-Ed from LA Times (fwd) Narins, Josh
• Re: [EM] NYTimes.com Article: French Twist: A Fair Way to PickOscars? Forest Simmons
• RE:Zimbabwe [EM] Narins, Josh
  • RE: Zimbabwe [EM] Narins, Josh
• [EM] Redistricting Op-Ed from LA Times (fwd) Alex Small
• [EM] Approval Voting Op-Ed material Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Approval Voting Op-Ed material Alex Small
• [EM] WSJ Gerrymander story DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] WSJ Gerrymander story Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] WSJ Gerrymander story Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] WSJ Gerrymander story Joseph Malkevitch
  • RE: [EM] WSJ Gerrymander story Narins, Josh
• Re: Approval's effect on candidates Bart Ingles
  • RE: Approval's effect on candidates Narins, Josh
• [EM] Letter Anthony Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Letter Narins, Josh
• [EM] Stupid People Tricks Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Stupid People Tricks Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Stupid People Tricks Anthony Simmons
• [EM] a few things Alex Small
• [EM] Nader Douglas Greene
• [EM] election-for-sale typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• RE: The History of Apportionment Narins, Josh
• [EM] Detroit, Mich. City Council election Nov. 2001 DEMOREP1
• [EM] The question of Alaska approach MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Addendum to Markus reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman & Schwartz set MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Tideman & Schwartz set Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Tideman & Schwartz set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. ___ (2000) DEMOREP1
  • RE: [EM] Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. ___ (2000) Narins, Josh
• Re: [EM] $2002 in 2002 update Joe Weinstein
• [EM] $2002 in 2002 update Alex Small
• [EM] The History of Apportionment Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] The History of Apportionment Forest Simmons
• [EM] Anthony ad absurdum? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval's effect on candidates DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] $2002 in 2002 Bart Ingles
• [EM] Post Prop A Douglas Greene
• [EM] Reply to Rob L., re: IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Reply to Rob L., re: IRV Rob Lanphier
  • Re: [EM] Reply to Rob L., re: IRV Forest Simmons
• [EM] RP & Schwartz set MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] RP & Schwartz set Markus Schulze
• [EM] I meant Tideman(wv) ! MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re:[EM] Getting to know you... Alex Small
• [EM] CVD Comments on IRV Mar. 11, 2002 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Josh's letter MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Josh's letter Narins, Josh
• [EM] Getting to know you... Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Getting to know you... Jurij Toplak
• [EM] Possible Material for Pro-AV Pamphlet Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Possible Material for Pro-AV Pamphlet Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV letter to the editor MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Our laziness let IRV win MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Ranked Pairs Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Our laziness let IRV win Markus Schulze
• [EM] Strategy and Winner-Take-All Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Strategy and Winner-Take-All Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cyclic Ambiguity in Condorcet Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Instant 2-stage plurality/pairwise runoff atarr
  • Re: [EM] Instant 2-stage plurality/pairwise runoff Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Instant 2-stage plurality/pairwise runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguity in Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguity in Condorcet Forest Simmons
• [EM] Effect of Approval on candidate behavior Rob Lanphier
• [EM] IRV in SF and beyond (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] I pledge $50 to Hager MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: I pledge $50 to Hager Rob LeGrand
• Re: IRV unconsitutiona;? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: IRV unconsitutiona;? Anthony Simmons
  • Re: IRV unconsitutiona;? Rob Lanphier
• RE: Saari's Basic Argument DEMOREP1
  • Re: Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • [EM] On good terms AVnow
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF and Vermont Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF and Vermont Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF and Vermont Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Contact info for $2002 in 2002 Alex Small
• [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF and Vermont Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF and Vermont Bart Ingles
• Re: IRV unconstitutional? Bart Ingles
  • Re: IRV unconstitutional? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: IRV unconstitutional? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: IRV unconstitutional? Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV wins big in SF & Vermont DEMOREP1
• [EM] action? Alex Small
• [EM] Re: IRV Unconstitutional? Alex Small

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]