If someone points out that I haven't shown that there's a ranking-set consistent with the pairwise defeat magnitudes in my example, I reply that Blake showed that, by adding some as-yet unknown constant to all the pairwise vote totals, we can make any set of pairwise vote totals into an example that is consistent with some ranking-set.
Doing that doesn't change what happens in my example. The order of the defeats' magnitudes is unchanged. The pair-ties are still pair-ties. So if I'm right about what Blake showed about that, it isn't necessary to post a set of rankings for the example. There's a set of rankings with which RP can choose outside the Schwartz set, and with which there are no equal defeats. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
