Jurij- "Tantalizingly" means "very interestingly, in a manner that makes one want to know more." (my definition, not a dictionary).
You wrote in a previous message that you had applied your study of redistricting to your country. I thought (and I assume Josh did too) that you were suggesting that you had in fact actually persuaded the government to implement your proposed redistricting method. To hear that somebody on the list had actually reformed an entire country's redistricting laws would be very exciting. Because you didn't actually say that, but it sounded like that might be the case, it was very "tantalizing", we wanted to know more. The ambiguity had nothing to do with your English, of course (I've never noticed any language errors in your posts, I assume you are very fluent). The ambiguity was solely from lack of detail. The fact that you contributed to a case before your country's Constitutional Court is very interesting, and inspiring to those of us who want to see election reforms in our own countries. Even though the truth is not quite as grand as one might have guessed from the original message, it's still very impressive. Alex
