election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2007/10/01 Re: [EM] To ws, re: Condorcet vs Approval Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/09/30 [EM] Better answer to WS's example Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/09/28 [EM] Some Approval strategies Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] renaming DYN greg wolfe
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] renaming DYN greg wolfe
• 2007/07/23 [EM] renaming DYN Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Intermediate Ratings Never Optimal? Stephane Rouillon
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Intermediate Ratings Never Optimal? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Don't care much about a little disenfranchisement (was Re: Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting.) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Stephane Rouillon
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Chris Benham
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] "Social Utility Will Look After Itself" Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/23 [EM] Winning votes criteria against margins criteria. Stephane Rouillon
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Juho--Schudy's statement is correct. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 [EM] RE : Re: RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Kevin Venzke
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Chris Benham
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 [EM] RE : Re: Corrected "strategy in Condorcet" section Kevin Venzke
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Intermediate RV rating is never optimal Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 [EM] Don't care much about a little disenfranchisement (was Re: Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting.) Steve Eppley
• 2007/07/23 [EM] RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Kevin Venzke
• 2007/07/23 [EM] Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/23 Re: [EM] Corrected "strategy in Condorcet" section Juho
• 2007/07/22 [EM] Corrected "strategy in Condorcet" section ws
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting. Paul Kislanko
• 2007/07/22 [EM] Range Voting Strategy ws
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Intermediate Ratings Never Optimal? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipff & Schudy about range voting. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Juho--Schudy's statement is correct. Steve Eppley
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipoff & Schudy about range voting. Steve Eppley
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Intermediate RV rating is never optimal Chris Benham
• 2007/07/22 Re: [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipff & Schudy about range voting. Chris Benham
• 2007/07/22 [EM] Social Utility (aka Bayesian regret, aka Voter Satisfaction) methodology Warren Smith
• 2007/07/21 Re: [EM] Intermediate RV rating is never optimal Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/21 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/21 Re: [EM] Intermediate RV rating is never optimal Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/21 [EM] Correction of false statements by Ossipff & Schudy about range voting. Warren Smith
• 2007/07/21 Re: [EM] Some Approval strategies Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/21 [EM] Juho--Schudy's statement is correct. Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/21 Re: [EM] RV comments Juho
• 2007/07/21 [EM] Intermediate RV rating is never optimal Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/20 Re: [EM] RV comments Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/20 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/20 Re: [EM] RV comments Chris Benham
• 2007/07/20 Re: [EM] RV comments Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/20 [EM] Approval's worst problem isn't a problem Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/20 [EM] RV comments Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/19 Re: [EM] To ws, re: Condorcet vs Approval Howard Swerdfeger
• 2007/07/19 [EM] Rank methods are quirky. The best are worth it. Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/19 [EM] And the Reds would hear about the order-reversal plan Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/19 Re: [EM] To ws, re: Condorcet vs Approval Howard Swerdfeger
• 2007/07/18 Re: [EM] JS Mill's _Representative Government_, chapter 7 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/18 [EM] WS: Blue wins in your example Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/18 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 14 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/18 [EM] JS Mill's _Representative Government_, chapter 7 Steve Barney
• 2007/07/18 Re: [EM] To ws, re: Condorcet vs Approval Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/18 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 14 ws
• 2007/07/18 [EM] To ws, re: Condorcet vs Approval Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/18 Re: [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Juho
• 2007/07/17 Re: [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/17 Re: [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Winners but Condorcet Methods can Elect Condorcet Losers Juho
• 2007/07/17 Re: [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Winners but Condorcet Methods can Elect Condorcet Losers Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/17 Re: [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Winners but Condorcet Methods can Elect Condorcet Losers peter barath
• 2007/07/15 Re: [EM] DYN Juho
• 2007/07/15 [EM] When Voters Strategize, Approval Voting Elects Condorcet Winners but Condorcet Methods can Elect Condorcet Losers ws
• 2007/07/15 [EM] Launching AllAboutVoting.com ! greg wolfe
• 2007/07/13 Re: [EM] Fwd: 2008 election fiasco is preventable Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/13 Re: [EM] Fwd: 2008 election fiasco is preventable Jonathan Lundell
• 2007/07/13 Re: [EM] Fwd: 2008 election fiasco is preventable Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/13 [EM] Fwd: 2008 election fiasco is preventable Kathy Dopp
• 2007/07/12 Re: [EM] DYN Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/12 Re: [EM] DYN Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/12 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 8 Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/12 [EM] Using PR-STV for districting single member districts raphfrk
• 2007/07/11 Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] PLEASE help election reform by reading this article Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/07/11 [EM] PLEASE help election reform by reading this article Jan Kok
• 2007/07/10 Re: [EM] DYN Juho
• 2007/07/09 [EM] DYN Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/08 [EM] Old topic: Finding the "most representative" ranked ballot Paul Kislanko
• 2007/07/05 [EM] DSV Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/05 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 5 Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/05 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 4 raphfrk
• 2007/07/03 Re: [EM] feedback loops in elections and election methods Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/03 Re: [EM] manipulation free method? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/07/02 Re: [EM] Closed loop elections Michael Poole
• 2007/07/02 [EM] Closed loop elections James Gilmour
• 2007/07/02 Re: [EM] manipulation free method? Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/07/01 [EM] ABC News online has a brief blurb on election methods mrouse1
• 2007/06/30 Re: [EM] Manipulation Free? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/06/29 Re: [EM] manipulation free method? Dave Ketchum
• 2007/06/29 Re: [EM] manipulation free method? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/06/29 [EM] A word about manipulation Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/06/29 [EM] Maybe my suspicion can be justified somewhat Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/06/29 [EM] Forest--Your method proposal Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/06/29 [EM] Forest--Your method proposal Michael Ossipoff
• 2007/06/28 Re: [EM] manipulation free method? Jan Kok
• 2007/06/28 [EM] manipulation free method? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/06/27 Re: [EM] Ka-Ping Yee's voting behavior pictures Juho
• 2007/06/27 [EM] Yee pictures Warren Smith
• 2007/06/27 [EM] Ka-Ping Yee's voting behavior pictures mrouse1
• 2007/06/15 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/14 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Kathy Dopp
• 2007/06/14 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Kathy Dopp
• 2007/06/14 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/13 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Kathy Dopp
• 2007/06/13 Re: [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/13 Re: [EM] Approval Equilibrium Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/13 [EM] Approval Equilibrium Forest W Simmons
• 2007/06/13 [EM] Legal Analysis of HR811 & Brennan Center Think-Tank Analysis of HR811 Kathy Dopp
• 2007/06/13 Re: [EM] Approval Equilibrium Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/12 [EM] I've begun writing a paper on the Favorite Betrayal Criterion Alex Small
• 2007/06/12 [EM] Approval Equilibrium Forest W Simmons
• 2007/06/08 Re: [EM] Easy voting system optimality theorems Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/06/08 [EM] Easy voting system optimality theorems Warren Smith
• 2007/06/03 [EM] Presidential debate ordering raphfrk
• 2007/06/02 Re: [EM] Presidential debate ordering Gervase Lam
• 2007/05/29 Re: [EM] Conditional Approval (was "Does this method have a name?") Chris Benham
• 2007/05/27 Re: [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid Jonathan Lundell
• 2007/05/27 Re: [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid James Gilmour
• 2007/05/27 [EM] Confirmed advice for readers disturbed by my posts. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/27 [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid raphfrk
• 2007/05/26 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/26 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/26 Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] Dartmouth uses Approval Voting to elect trustees Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation James Gilmour
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/25 [EM] Dartmouth uses Approval Voting to elect trustees Jan Kok
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Jonathan Lundell
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting James Gilmour
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Chris Backert
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Chris Backert
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Brian Olson
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting James Gilmour
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Brian Olson
• 2007/05/25 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation James Gilmour
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/24 [EM] Cost of Manual Counting vs. Machine Counting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Michael Poole
• 2007/05/24 [EM] Rational Voters discussion BBC Radio 4 Stephen Turner
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation James Gilmour
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Chris Backert
• 2007/05/24 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/23 [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections raphfrk
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/22 [EM] Asset Voting from EM archives Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] Presidential debate ordering Howard Swerdfeger
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections Howard Swerdfeger
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] Presidential debate ordering Juho
• 2007/05/22 Re: [EM] Presidential debate ordering Howard Swerdfeger
• 2007/05/21 [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation Chris Backert
• 2007/05/21 Re: [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/21 [EM] stratified renormalisation for elections raphfrk
• 2007/05/20 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/20 Re: [EM] Important Facts About "Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act" Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/20 [EM] Important Facts About "Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act" Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/19 [EM] Presidential debate ordering mrouse1
• 2007/05/19 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/19 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/19 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 35, Issue 4 diegotello
• 2007/05/18 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/17 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/17 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/16 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/16 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/16 [EM] Conditional Approval (was "Does this method have a name?") Forest W Simmons
• 2007/05/16 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/15 [EM] Support Clean Elections in 2008 Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/15 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/15 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/14 Re: [EM] Does this method have a name? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/05/14 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/14 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/14 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/14 [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) raphfrk
• 2007/05/14 Re: [EM] A small remark about the Schulze-method Markus Schulze
• 2007/05/13 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/13 [EM] A small remark about the Schulze-method Peter Barath
• 2007/05/13 [EM] Circular paradox (Re: maybe a new variant of Condorcet) Peter Barath
• 2007/05/13 [EM] Rivest+Smith secure (Re: danger of coercion) Peter Barath
• 2007/05/13 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Juho
• 2007/05/12 Re: [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/12 Re: [EM] Does this method already have a name? Forest W Simmons
• 2007/05/11 [EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...) peter barath
• 2007/05/10 [EM] The House Administration Committee Sends Voter Confidence Bill to House Floor Kathy Dopp
• 2007/05/10 Re: [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/10 Re: [EM] First U.S. Scientific Election Audit Reveals Voting System Flaws but Questions Remain Unanswered Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2007/05/10 Re: [EM] Voting chaos James Gilmour
• 2007/05/09 Re: [EM] Does this method already have a name? Chris Benham
• 2007/05/09 Re: [EM] Voting chaos Brian Olson
• 2007/05/09 [EM] Voting chaos Gervase Lam

• Earlier messages