Paul Kislanko <kislanko <at> airmail.net> writes: > > You continue to ignore this point. Converting lots of > > data into a tiny amount of data means discarding data, > > any way you slice it. > > No, I ignore nothing. I only continue to be attacked for pointing > out that the emporor is naked.
I apologize if my comments came off as an attack. I am just trying to understand your complaint, and unfortunately I still don't. If you don't want to address the question, then from my point of view, your complaint doesn't make sense and I just have to consider it "proven" not valid and move on. (likewise, it's your right to not care if I or others dismiss your complaint) -rob ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
