On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:04:04 -0700 Simmons, Forest wrote:

> Steve Eppley suggested allowing voters to choose from published orderings and 
> then doing the tally by
> 
> "... a good voting method, such as Maximize Affirmed Majorities (MAM)."
> 
> Here's a suggestion for an easy-to-understand alternative to MAM that would 
> be adequate in this context:


I am looking at this without looking at MAM.

> 
> In the case that the most popular ordering is complete, start at the bottom 
> of that ordering and use the "Winner Stays" rule.  In other words, of the 
> bottom two alternatives on the most popular list, the one that is ranked 
> ahead of the other on more ballots than not is kept, and the other is 
> eliminated.  This elimination rule is repeatedly applied among the remaining 
> alternatives until only one candidate (the method winner) remains.


Looking much like Condorcet.  From there we know that cycles can occur, 
needing more thought here.

> 
> If the most popular order is not complete, then refine it using the order 
> that is second in popularity, then third in popularity, etc.
> 
> Note that Eppley's suggestion (in its simplest forms) requires only a 
> standard plurality style ballot, and each voter marks only one alternative (a 
> candidate's name or a code word for somebody else's published ordering).


Starts out looking good but, how many lists might there be with half a 
dozen candidates?
      What would this quantity do to the voting machine?
      How much might this confuse the voter looking for an acceptable list?

>  
> This is exactly the kind of simplicity that we need to get a viable 
> improvement over plurality for public elections.


Sounds like as much trouble as Condorcet and in counting complexity, 
though doable with present voting machines - provided they can tolerable 
the number of choices.

>  
> Forest
> 
>     
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----
> election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
> 


-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
  Dave Ketchum   108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY  13827-1708   607-687-5026
            Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
                  If you want peace, work for justice.


----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to