Wow! Great idea. If IRV is so pathological under the best of circumstances, then imagine what could happen when the going gets rough (multi-modal distributions of voters, etc.).
Interesting how close Condorcet and
From: Ka-Ping Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [EM] Visualizations of Plurality, Hare, Approval, and
Condorcet
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Hi folks,
I'm new here and hope to learn from others on this list. Thank you
for indulging me with this request for feedback.
I did some simulations of Plurality, Approval, Hare, and Condorcet
methods (under certain simplifying assumptions) and produced
visualizations of the results, which are posted at:
http://zesty.ca/voting/
I'm curious what you all think of this. I was already skeptical of
the Hare method but the results surprised even me -- are they
surprising to you?
-- ?!ng
<<winmail.dat>>
---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
