Re: [EM] Question about a criterion for ballot counting

[Alex Small]

Kevin-

 

I have looked at one or two of Woodall's papers.  Do you have a reference for that "continuous" criterion?  It's not quite what I'm looking for, but it's close.

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

Alex

Kevin Venzke wrote:

Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:23:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kevin Venzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EM] Question about a criterion for ballot counting
To: election-methods@electorama.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Alex,

The only thing similar that occurs to me is some features Woodall has used.
For instance:

<snip>

Continuous - if the result isn't a tie, then there's some value greater than zero by which every ballot type proportion can be adjusted which will still result in the same winner

<snip>

Kevin Venzke

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info