Ranked preferences could be derived from range. A=99, B=60, C=50, D=11 could be read as A>>B>C>>D. The information could be read also from some "floating point graphical format" (e.g. bars of different length). In these styles it may not be easy to express preferences of equal strength (like A>>B and C>>D above).

One quite easy style would be computer assisted ballot creation in the style shown below. Lines between the candidates indicate distance / strength of preference.
==============================================
Smith
Jones
-----
Brown
-----
-----
<others>
==============================================

Juho Laatu


On Oct 24, 2006, at 20:08 , Chris Benham wrote:

If a method uses the type of information you're referring to, then I
think it is much more convenient to use rating (range style) ballots and
infer it from them.

Chris Benham



Simmons, Forest wrote:

I think this style of ballot (with relative strengths of preferences indicated) are a good compromise between range ballots and ordinary rankings.

We have just scratched the surface when it comes to their possible applications.

Forest


--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---

----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info


----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info


                
___________________________________________________________ All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to