Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>But this is true of many other methods which are considered to satisfy IIA. > > Really? Such as? >However, maybe not. I could not find, easily, any description of what >methods satisfy it and what do not, and, it appears, there is some >considerable confusion about exactly what this criterion means. > But of course Abd isn't confused. >I'm >assuming that the criterion has an *objective* meaning that does not >require information not on the ballot. > Yes. Chris Benham ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
