I don't have time to reply to Warren's long, rambling rants. So I I don't
reply to something Warren said, that doesn't mean that he's said something
irrefutable. It just means that I don't have the time. I will, however, be
kind and generous enough to comment on a few of his statements.
Warren displayed his wondrous mindreading powers by guessing how i derived
Bias-Free's formula--right after I spelled it out for him.
Warren says I didn't define Bias-Free. But, in the message he quoted, I said
that I was describing an unbiased quota and rounding method. Can I thereby
be accused of using a perhaps unfamiliar substitute for the term "divisor
method"? Sure.
When you say that it is a divisor method, and you say how to find the
rounding point between consecutive integers a and b, then you have fully
defined the method.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
Type your favorite song. Get a customized station. Try MSN Radio powered
by Pandora. http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001
----
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
