Warren says: I mentioned before how Ossipoff, in his posts expressing his contempt for probability theory and the lack of need for valid probability density functions...
I reply: Would Warren be so good as to post the dates and times of the postings in which I expressed contempt for probabilitly theory and the lack of (sic) need for valid probability densit functions? Though contempt is a stronger word than I'd have used, I've probably expressed a little contempt for Warren's misuse and apparent misunderstanding of probability. Though BF only assumes unfiorm distribution in the cycle, Warren said that I assume it over an infinite range of positive and negative populations. He said that Weighted BF needs to approximate the distribution with something that is self-similar to infinity, and that is normalizable. Mike Ossipoff ' ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
