Warrens says: Anyhow, note that my method in http://rangevoting.org/NewAppo.html is capable (with a different value of "d") of handling the 1-seat-min still without "bias"...
I reply: At least Warren puts "bias" in quotes. Warren seems to be using measured q & s/q correlation as a carelessly-interpreted definlition of bias. Warren needs to be more careful about definitions. Yesterday I posted the widely-accepted definiition of bias, and a modification of it that is intended to avoid ambiguity. Anything someone says about bias should be justified in terms of a bias definition that that person can defend. The definition that I posted would be difficult to disagree with. Mike Ossipoff ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
