Forest W Simmons wrote: >>re's the improved version of PG-MPO (for want of a better name):
Ballots are range style. For each candidate X and each range level R, let A(X,R) be the number of ballots on which X is rated at level R or above.<< Here's the problem with that. If R is not an ordinal rank, then in "range style" every voter has a potentially different definition for "R". Everything that follows in the description is either ambiguous or requires some kind of normalization for "R", which would introduce a method affect that is independent of the voter's choice. ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
