On Jan 10, 2008 7:46 PM, Kevin Venzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plenty of incompatibilities have been proven at least with rank ballot > methods.
Well, there you go. > I doubt there's good reason to be optimistic about getting around > many of these incompatibilities by changing the ballot type. I think you're out to lunch. Cardinal ballot methods get around Arrow and Gibbard, which had been interpreted as meaning "No voting method is fair." If that's not a good reason to be optimistic, I don't know what could be.
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
