Hi Chris, --- Chris Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Kevin, > Soon after you raised this I asked if this met any criteria not met by > IRV. > You said "no", and that it fails Later-no-Help. > > I thought it might be interesting if applied to the IRV last 3.
I have yet to come up with a good reason why this shouldn't be done. Harder to count of course. > 49: A > 48: B > 03: C>B > > But now I see that like DSC it disastrously fails Dominant Mutual > Third, electing > A in the example. > > So IRV remains my favourite LNHarm method Surely the clone-winner issue is a bigger problem? One thing to note is that the B voters, if they can foresee what the C voters will do, have incentive to vote for C even if their second choice is actually A. This is the "benign" burial strategy that SPST has. Kevin Venzke __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
