On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:34 PM, James Gilmour wrote:
Those who would devise new schemes of electoral districts, especially
to go with new voting systems, ignore the reality of these various
"geographically defined communities" at their peril.
There's a proposition on the November ballot in California that
would establish an independent commission to draw (single-member)
state legislative districts (the legislature draws them now). The
list might be interested in the criteria specified for use by the
commission. Sorry, I only have a scan and don't feel like typing it
in.
To the list admin, fyi: this message was received by the list's
servers on 9/4, and sent on today (a second time; it was also sent on
9/4):
Received: from frida.dreamhost.com (frida.dreamhost.com
[66.33.206.23]) by
sienna.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4BB19B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>;
Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diego.dreamhost.com (diego.dreamhost.com
[66.33.216.104]) by
frida.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7961317FE3; Mon, 29 Sep 2008
21:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from diego.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
diego.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251E948044; Mon, 29 Sep 2008
21:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from swarthymail-mx1.g.dreamhost.com
(swarthymail-mx1.g.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.31]) by
diego.dreamhost.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1B148044 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:21:55 -0700
(PDT)
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
