On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Markus Schulze wrote:
Dear Jonathan Lundell,
you wrote (7 Oct 2008):
Their specific argument, though, is that the existing
two-round plurality system is non-monotonic; they don't
actually rely on the argument that all voting systems
are non-monotonic.
Well, the second paper is more general. Here they use
Arrow's Theorem to argue why monotonicity has to be
sacrificed.
Markus Schulze
Or at least that something has to be sacrificed. Do you see that as a
problem?
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
