Greg Nisbet wrote:
> Which system would be the most bang for the buck? What system would take the
> least amount of convincing for the greatest gain?
> ...
> Which system do you think would work best that is actually achievable?
Don't forget cascade voting, because:
a) cost = zero bucks
b) no need to convince voters up front (they can just try it out),
nor get approval from government nor parties (they have no say)
c) actually achievable, because we're doing it now (but yet to prove
popularity)
d) works best in theory, so I think (but, again, yet to prove)
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/home.xht
Anyway, it's something different to consider.
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, 647-436-4521
http://zelea.com/
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
