Hi Raph, --- En date de : Lun 20.10.08, Raph Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > De: Raph Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Objet: Re: [EM] Voting Theory and Populism clarification > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Lundi 20 Octobre 2008, 6h59 > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Venzke > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Consider these sincere preference orders: > > > > 40 A>B>C > > 20 B>A>C > > 40 C>B>A > > > > I can't see any reason why it couldn't be > expected that only A will > > receive majority approval, but B would defeat A in a > runoff. > > Assume they use the 'approve the best of the top 2 + > anyone you prefer > to the expected winner'.
I can't understand why you left out the possibility that the "top two" are considered to be A and C! This should be quite possible if A and B are considered more similar to each other than either is to C. Kevin Venzke __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
