under a condition which is, in fact, violated.
On 11/8/09, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Warren Smith wrote: > >> 2. Bouricius forgot to mention, same way he usually forgets to >> mention, that Tideman also found IRV to be "unsupportable." > > "conditionally supportable", actually. > -- Warren D. Smith http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking "endorse" as 1st step) and math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info