election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV seat count, and start small and locally Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and James Gilmour. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and James Gilmour. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Jameson: reply regarding SODA & favorite-burial MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA Kevin Venzke
• [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Raph Frank
  • [EM] Campaign contribution reform Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform Richard Fobes
• [EM] Something that can happen in SODA MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Something that can happen in SODA Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Something that can happen in SODA Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: Conditional methods and DH3 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Markus Schulze
• [EM] Real-world examples of chicken dilemma? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Real-world examples of chicken dilemma? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Seeking co-author for paper on SODA, chicken dilemma, and Mturk experiments Jameson Quinn
• [EM] i don't get why mixed member rules use FPTP??? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] i don't get why mixed member rules use FPTP??? Kevin Venzke
• [EM] NYT voting reform dialogue published today. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Jameson: I thought you said that people can safely rate sincerely in MJ. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Poll on favorite voting methods Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re, take 2: NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 55 David L Wetzell
• [EM] MJ, Kristofer MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Bryan Mills
• Re: [EM] Kevin V David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] FW: Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson MJ. Alternative IC rule? ICT's main problem. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] <ref> tags on electowiki? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Semi-honest criterion"? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] FYI: Wikipedia table of criteria compliances Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. Raph Frank
• Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) Raph Frank
• [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Universality of top-count-conditionality. MTAOC alone. Stepwise-When-Necessary. Conditional in Condorcet? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Kevin V. wrt anti-Approval Voting. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] not fair. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] not fair. David L Wetzell
• [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] RBJ et al. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] RBJ et al. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: MJ MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: MJ Jameson Quinn
• [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Declaration update: Announcing Facebook page and BanSingleMarkBallots.org website Richard Fobes
• [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation robert bristow-johnson
  • [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Top-majority options for Approval? An alternative 3-slot option. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 17 David L Wetzell
• [EM] proposal for posting style Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] proposal for posting style Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] When wouldn't SODA elect the CW? Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Ken & Karla
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell

• Earlier messages
• Later messages