At 10:37 AM 1/23/2010, Michael Rouse wrote:
Steven E. Landsburg (author of The Armchair Economist), had an interesting problem here: <http://www.thebigquestions.com/2010/01/21/office-politics/>http://www.thebigquestions.com/2010/01/21/office-politics/ (in reference to an original question of the New York Times ethics column here: <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/magazine/03FOB-Ethicist-t.html>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/magazine/03FOB-Ethicist-t.html)

Basically, you have a bunch of professors of different seniority wanting a bunch of rooms of different desirability. The original article at the Times suggested a lottery. Steven Landsburg suggested a market, where professors bid what they wanted for a particular room.

What values are to be optimized by the choices? Surely the method used would depend on the goal!

How is the choice of method to be made? Is it a dictatorship, i.e., top-down decision-making structure? If it's a dictatorship, then a wise dictator would want to be advised by those affected by the choice, so that would involve collecting preference and preference strength information, first as to method of making the assignments, then as to actual assignment choices.

Normally, there would not be a lot of "move-in" assignments at once, unless there is a new building. Rather, I'd think, the presumption would be that once you have an office, and unless you want to move, you'd have the right to stay there. It's disruptive to move....

While it's possible to set up point-allocation system that would be a part of the compensation package for a professor, it's not clear that this would be sufficiently more functional than more informal methods. I'd suggest that the basic structural issue should be addressed first. To what extent does the general opinion of the professorial community matter? That of the students who will also be affected? Who is in charge?

Utility optimization could get hairy, as noted, but full optimization analysis might not be necessary. Rather a means of generating a utility value for a particular allocation could be developed and applied to relevant pairs. A rank order ballot, equal ranking allowed, cast by each professor, might provide useful information.


----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to