Markus Schulze wrote:
Hallo,
here is an interesting paper by Ron Rivest:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/RivestShen-AnOptimalSingleWinnerPreferentialVotingSystemBasedOnGameTheory.pdf
He gets to the conclusion that the Schulze
method is "nearly perfect" (page 12).
I'm curious now as to how often, say, Ranked Pairs would disagree with
GT/GTD/GTS.
Do you consider the GT agreement a worthwhile metric, i.e. that (absent
criteria problems) methods closer to GT are better?
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
