Hallo, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote (16 April 2010):
> I'm curious now as to how often, say, Ranked > Pairs would disagree with GT/GTD/GTS. Do you > consider the GT agreement a worthwhile metric, > i.e. that (absent criteria problems) methods > closer to GT are better? I don't like probabilistic models, because I don't think that voters are random variables. However, I am impressed how often authors get to the conclusion that the Schulze method is the best method in random simulations. Markus Schulze ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
