On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Peter Zbornik wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com <mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com>> wrote: At 04:24 PM 4/25/2010, Peter Zbornik wrote: Hi, I am a member of the Czech Green party, and we are giving our statutes an overhaul. We are a small parliamentary party with only some 2000 members. Lately we have had quite some problems infighting due to the winner-takes-it-all election methods used within the party. ... The best way to handle council officer electinos is within the council itself, and repeated ballot is the standard way to do it; these officers should serve at the pleasure of the council, they are servants of the council. Thus ordinarily majority vote is adequate, and simple.
I'll be surprised if a version of asset voting is appealing to these folks. To me, asset voting has always sounded very similar to Soviet "democracy". A multistage process with a hierarchy of voters creates rich opportunities for various forms of coercion, and distances voters from the choice of leaders even more than they are now. That's the way it worked in the Soviet Union, and I'm sure the Czechs are familiar with the history.
-- Andrew ----- Andrew Myers Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Cornell University ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
