Hi Jameson, --- En date de : Jeu 21.7.11, Kevin Venzke <[email protected]> a écrit : > I *think* this is what you do, or can do: > > For each pair, find the best possible score this pair could > have by > moving the threshold. (So, for each pair you try every > threshold. The > best score ever achieved indicates the winning pair.)
So, I tried this with 3- and 4-slots, using only U. Not exactly your method but it might give you ideas. I found that the truncation incentive was horrendous. If I just let the better of the two raw ratings count as the ballot's vote for that pair, it cuts the truncation rate in half (but it's still bad). I think the voters do not trust the automation... Kevin Venzke ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
