[EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.

[C.Benham]

Mike Ossipoff wrote (15 Nov 2011):

<snip>
By the way, when people object to "random-fill incentive" for MDDTR, 
maybe they're
forgetting that MDDTR is a 3-slot method.
 
And, if MMPO were proposed as a 3-slot method, that would avoid the 
"random-fill incentive"
criticism of it too.


Mike, why do you think it will do that?  There's no reason why a 3-slot 
method can't have a random-fill
incentive. 

Chris Benham
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info