[email protected] wrote:
Mike,
I like MMPO2 because (unlike MMPO1) it takes into account opposition from
supporters of eliminated candidates, so is more broad based, and it is easily
seen to satisfy the FBC. Also it allows more brad based support than MMPO3 where
only the support by top raters is considered in the tie breaking process.
MMPO2 sounds a lot like what I've called Ext-Minmax, but with pairwise
opposition instead of wv or margins.
I originally devised of Ext-Minmax to resolve some tie problems while
checking Smith,Minmax(margins) for mono-add-top failures - I didn't find
any, but Kevin Venzke did.
What would the pairwise opposition equivalent of the Smith set be? Would
it still be the Smith set - and would Smith,Ext-MMPO (to coin a term)
pass mono-add-top?
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
