On 12/27/2011 10:13 PM, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
Because of the great desirability of avoiding the ABE problem, it's
worth considering or looking at
all sorts of possible solutions.

MMPO and MDDTR are known to work fine, though they have vulnerability to
non-valid criticisms.

If you're referring to Kevin's example, I don't think you can call the MMPO criticism inherently "non-valid". To quote yourself, in an earlier post:

You (Kristofer Munsterhjelm -ed) wrote:

You could of course argue that "if I gave it to B, A would have been
just as unhappy, and if I gave it to A, B would have been just as
unhappy, so I dare you to show me the particular group that has been
wronged by this". I still think that you can say that you wronged the
two groups as a whole

[endquote]

Ok, sure. You may have wronged them collectively, by electing someone over whom
no one in either group prefers anyone other than their favorite.

The question is, how badly does that wrong them?

Badly enough to give up FBC, SFC, LNHa, CD, and Mono-Add-Plump?

The ABE problem might be a peculiarly American problem. I don't expect others
to recognize it as a problem. We have the Republocrats, and, additionally, lots 
of
small factions who are terribly mutually antagonistic, jealous, and 
rivalry-inclined; but
which, together, might add up to a majority.

This, I took to mean that with MMPO, you pay some to get some compliances you want. You "pay" by having the method exhibit the strange results in Kevin's example, and you get FBC, SFC, LNHarm, etc., in return.

Furthremore, your "might be a pecuilarly American problem" then suggests that there's nothing inherently non-valid about the criticism. You say that it is non-valid from your own point of view, where you think the tradeoff made by MMPO is worth it. Others (like me) may have different opinions. Saying that you're willing to make the tradeoff is quite a different thing than saying that the criticism (e.g. MMPO's Plurality failure) is inherently invalid.

----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to