Good Afternoon, Michael I'm working my way through your proposal.
It is not entirely clear how a group can have the form of a party without the substance. To the extent that people organize, they cannot escape Robert Michels' dictum: "It is indisputable that the oligarchical and bureaucratic tendency of party organization is a matter of technical and practical necessity. It is the inevitable product of the very principle of organization".
This may be a semantic problem; perhaps some word other than 'party' would better fit the case (public body?). In any event, acquiring "the labour, money and other resources needed to make it happen" is non-trivial.
The "argument of inevitable success" may be a bit optimistic. Like all political ideas, this one bears the burden of persuading a large portion of the population to adopt the method. Perhaps some form of telephone application could go viral. That might gain adherents quickly but might also turn into a passing fad.
There are two worrying aspects about the proposal. One is the lack of a way for the people to carefully examine candidates to determine their ability and integrity. The other is that the concept may be susceptible to media-induced frenzies.
One thought that struck me while studying the proposal was the similarity to Michael Moore's We Want You (www.wewantyou.us). If a combination of that effort and your ideas is possible, it might be beneficial.
Fred ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
