This describes a practical method of electing proportional legislatures while empowering every member of the electorate to the full extent of each individual's desire and ability. It uses the 2010 Dutch Parliamentary elections[1] for realistic size relationships between parties contending for public office. The voting eligible population, the distribution of voters among the political parties, and the number of elective seats available are taken from this report which is used for verisimilitude only.

The proportional distribution of the seats in the legislatures is calculated using the reported turnout for each party as a percentage of the voting eligible population. In the cited report, 9,442,977 people (75.4% of the voting eligible population of 12,523,842) voted in 2010. Of these, 9,312,710 voted for one of ten political parties. Since the source material shows that seats were only allocated to members of parties, we see that 130,267 voters and 3,080,865 non-voters were unrepresented.

Since no electoral method that systematically excludes a large portion of the electorate from representation can be called democratic, we combine the latter two groups to form an 11th category (i.e., "None") of 3,211,132 people who are also entitled to representation.

       Proportional Distribution of Legislative Seats
   (based on Political Parties in the Netherlands - 2010)

                      House              European     Total
           Party      of Rep   Senate   Parliament   Elective
          Members     seats    seats      seats      Offices
Party*    (2010)      (150)     (75)       (25)       (250)
-----     ------      -----    -----      -----      --------
None    3,211,132       38       19          6          64
VVD     1,929,575       23       11          4          39
PvdA    1,848,805       22       11          4          37
PVV     1,454,493       17        9          3          29
CDA     1,281,886       15        8          3          26
SP        924,696       11        5          2          18
D66       654,167        8        4          1          13
GL        628,096        8        4          1          13
CU        305,094        4        2          1           6
SGP       163,581        2        1          0           3
PvdD      122,317        2        1          0           2
----   ----------      ---       --         --         ---
Total  12,523,842      150       75         25         250

* Party abbreviations are taken from the cited report.  The
  party names have no significance for this description but
  are available on request.

The electoral method is described in detail in the Practical Democracy entry on Participedia[2] and in posts on the Election-Methods site on 02/04/08, 09/11/08 and 03/06/09. The members of each category of voters (party) are divided into triads that select one participant to represent the other two. Those so selected are again divided into triads and the process continues, pyramid-wise, until a target number of candidates, determined by those who implement the process, are selected. The method of assigning selected individuals to public offices, which must adhere to electoral district boundaries and other electoral strictures, is implementation-dependent.

This electoral method features several noteworthy features:

* It includes every member of the electorate in the electoral
  process.

* Each member of the electorate can participate in the process
  to the full extent of their desire and ability.

* It is a bottom-up process.  It lets the people decide what
  issues concern them and who are the best people to address
  those issues.  (This is in contrast to the prevailing top-down
  methodology that lets party leaders set the agenda and choose
  the candidates the people will be allowed to elect.)

* It eliminates political campaigning and the corrosive effect
  political campaigns have on society.  It stops the corruption
  that flows from soliciting campaign funds.

* It completes in less time than traditional, campaign-based
  electoral methods.  Furthermore, as each level completes,
  approximately 2/3rds of the remaining participants have
  fulfilled their civic obligation and are free to resume
  their normal lives.

* It guarantees that all candidates are carefully examined to
  determine their suitability for public office by people who
  have an incentive to uncover their flaws.  It creates a direct
  link between a candidate's character and chance of election.

* It includes a simple, direct way for the people to guide or
  instruct their candidates and, after the election is complete,
  to recall elected officials.

The bottom-up nature of the Practical Democracy concept lets the people impress their moral sense on their government.

Fred Gohlke

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_Netherlands
[2] http://participedia.net/methods/practical-democracy
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to