2012/12/8 ⸘Ŭalabio‽ <[email protected]> > 2012:12-08T08:30:24Z, Kristofer Munsterhjelm: > > > On 12/08/2012 06:19 AM, ⸘Ŭalabio‽ wrote: > > >> 1. > > >> This is my preferred range: > > >> Negative -99 to positive +99 > > > The ponies already objected to your preferred range, and I think > their objection has validity. If they find it too hard to find the right > rating between -99 and +99, then they'll consider the method bad however > you put it. Again, RBJ has voiced the same point here on the list: "Range > asks for too much, Approval asks for too little". > > ¡That is so last week! I wish to find a way to merge Score-Voting > and Majority-Judgement into something even better. > > In order to find something better, we would at least need to know what's wrong with what we have. There seems to be a lot of disagreement about that point; smart people can't agree on whether Score or MJ is better. So I think research is in order before we tear off and design 15 new systems.
Jameson
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
