> IIAC merely says that removal of a losing candidate shouldn't change > the result. > > IIAC says nothing about whether there should be another election if a > losing candidate calls for one without hir in it.. > > IIAC is merely about consistent count-mechanics, given an unchanging > set of ballots. >
Well, you're arguing for a definition of IIAC that even plurality passes. I find it lacking, and do not accept it for my definition of "independence of irrelevant alternatives". ~ Andy
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
