From: "Markus Schulze" <[email protected]>
>
> on 19 April 2013, the Associated Student Government at
> Northwestern University used the Schulze method to choose
> its President.
>
> With 3471 cast ballots, this was the largest Schulze election
> ever. See:
>
> https://asg.northwestern.edu/news/2013/04/announcing-2013-asg-executive-elections-results
>
�
since there was no cycle, any Condorcet compliant work have worked
identically.� if it had a cycle, since there were only three candidate tickets,
Schulze, Tideman, and MinMax would still have performed identically.
Markus, do you think they counted the ballots by hand or
with a scanner of some sort?� if by hand, they would just do the pairwise
elections (there would be 3 different pairwise elections), record the winner
and margin of each pair, any of these different methods would be executed on
the margins.� do you think that's what they did (apply Schulze
to the 3 pairwise results), or since a CW was immediately apparent, wouldn't
they just quit at that point?
just curious.
bestest,
�
r b-j
�
�
�
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
