On 10/06/2015 03:02 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:23 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: >> On 10/06/2015 06:00 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 11:15 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: >>>> Note, elfutils does not explicitly enable AM_SILENT_RULES. It's only >>>> available starting from automake 1.11 >>> >>> Note that we already require 1.11 or higher for parallel-tests. >>> I wouldn't mind if we also just added AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]) by default. >> >> I do prefer silent builds too. You'll probably want to force V=1 for >> automated builds like rpm though. I leave the default choice to you. > > OK, I'll add AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]) as default unless someone objects. > (btw. the rpm builds currently use make -s, so using the silent rules > would actually give more output.) > >> It's easy to answer "what defines" -- they're set in /usr/bin/automake >> handle_languages() based on $lang->ccer and $lang->lder, which are names >> declared in earlier register_language() calls. >> >> I have no idea if they're "officially" OK though. It's strange that >> these aren't documented at all. In practice it should be fine, I think, >> but if you want to be really careful we can define our own renamed variants. > > Odd they aren't officially documented. But they look official enough. I > saw other projects also use them in front of LINK and COMPILE steps, so > we are at least in good company. So please do just use them as is.
Pushed!
