On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 18:26 -0500, Bret Barkelew wrote:
> Hi, While searching for an answer to the same problem, I stumbled
> across a posting on this mailing list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00085.html 
> 
> I wanted to take a stab at patching it to work generically using a
> dynamic address returned from AllocatePages, but I get the impression
> that this is more complicated than just changing the address. 
> 
> What else needs to be fixed to make it work properly? Something about
> relocating the kernel image? 
> 
> Thanks for any help. 
> -- Jonathan Barkelew 
Essentially the kernel "relocatable" option implemented in the ia64
subtree (see elilo/ia64/config.c)needs to be implemented for ia32 &
x86_64 or perhaps elilo can be smartened up to figure it out, 
havent looked into that route yet.

-jason

-- 
___________________________________
JASON FLEISCHLI
HP - Alliances, Linux, & Performance Solutions
Ft. Collins CO (970)898-0874


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
elilo-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/elilo-discuss

Reply via email to