On 08/10/07 02:50 +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ... > > distributed at unicode.org I assumed them all to be of the same license. > > Oh, look here: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1
[snip...] > lists those licences as GPL compatible so this one should be too. I agree with your assessment. > How about: > - We add that text into COPYING, with a list of the files to > which it applies. > - We replace all the bundled charset mapping files with current > versions from www.unicode.org where available. > - We add to each such file a comment like: > # The following data has been downloaded from > # <http://www.unicode.org/Public/> and is thus covered by the > # Unicode, Inc. License agreement included in the COPYING file > # of ELinks, regardless of the terms shown below. This comment > # and the lines above were not in the original data. > > Then it should be fully compliant? Yes, that should be enough. Regards, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
