On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:39:17PM -0400, cga2000 wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:23:45PM EDT, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote: > [..] > > > > > > As a result I did a regular tarball install of spidermonkey. > > > > I replied to myself to clarify what I meant. Sorry for my initial > > response and that you missed my correction. > > > > > [...] > > > Thanks much for your patience. Where can I take a look at the updated > > > ecmascript.txt..? > > > > http://pasky.or.cz/gitweb.cgi?p=elinks.git;a=blob;f=doc/ecmascript.txt > > > > There isn't really much to see--just a couple of short, new paragraphs. > > > $ apt-cache search spidermonkey > > libsmjs-dev - Development files for the SpiderMonkey JS library > libsmjs1 - The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript library > spidermonkey-bin - Binaries of the SpiderMonkey interpreter > spidermonkey-dev - Migration package for the SpiderMonkey JS library > spidermonkey1 - Migration package for the SpiderMonkey JS library > > .. mind you, this is debian stable (sarge).. and since the > ecmascript.txt document only mentions testing and unstable, it may > still be necessary to do a tarball install of spidermonkey(?)
The instructions were old. I've now updated them for Sarge. Reload the URI above or see this for just the diffs: <http://pasky.or.cz/gitweb.cgi?p=elinks.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b22a65ba94c53fad0600f5aa2cd97715c59360b> > To recap, the way I understand the new doc, what I should have done is: > > $ apt-get libsmjs1 libsmjs-dev spidermonkey-bin spidermonkey-dev spidermonkey-bin and spiderkmonkey-dev are unnecessary.. > $ cd ../elinks; ./configure; make; make install > > .. with the result that libjs lib would have been installed in > /usr/lib/ .. this making a non-issue of my ldconfig problem, right? Correct, except that it would be called libsmjs, not libjs. > .. or did I also need to apt-get spidermonkey1? Nope. > .. or would installing the two -dev packages have pulled all other > necessary packages? `apt-get install libsmjs-dev` is adequate. > At least to me this is still not very clearly explained in the revised > version of the ecmascript.txt document. Is there anything more that should be clarified in the latest version? > Anyway, just my 2cents.. > > Thanks Thanks for your suggestions, -- Miciah Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
