On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:51:32AM EDT, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:54:27AM -0400, cga2000 wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:36:57PM EDT, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:46:18PM -0400, cga2000 wrote: > > > > .. or am I over-simplifying / missing something? > > > > > > How does the current revision look? > > > > > Unless I missed it.. it still does not mention debian stable.. and > > since it's the only linux system I am running at this point I can't > > really comment on the changes. > > Curious. > <http://pasky.or.cz/gitweb.cgi?p=elinks.git;a=blob;f=doc/ecmascript.txt> > shows the revision that mentions stable when I reload it. > > How about > <http://pasky.or.cz/gitweb.cgi?p=elinks.git;a=blob;h=73f5ba00fec87b82ed506e07bad5279779753b43;hb=2962e29f2e15231551b9fe15a51facee210c7be0;f=doc/ecmascript.txt>? > That's more like it ... :-)
I've no idea what happened and why I wasn't seeing these changes earlier. For debian and non-debian users alike, it's a lot clearer - remember that I went through the minor hassle of installing spidermonkey from source.. Maybe that for debian users the document should mention that in the event spidermonkey is not already installed the packages that they need to install are spidermonkey-bin and spidermonkey-dev? Or does the install of libsmjs-dev suffice? If the latter, the line that reads: Installing the -dev package will automatically pull in the library package. .. should read: Installing the -dev package will automatically pull in the spidermonkey engine and the library package. ? Thanks cga _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
