> > That's definitely fair to say, Ben, though I will have to say that as far > as other functional languages go, Elixir *looks* pretty imperative. :) >
You probably mean to say Elixir is *sequential*. Imperative programming definition focuses a lot on changing the program state, which is something we minimize in Elixir. For example, using for-loops for mutating an array is an imperative construct, in Elixir we would use Enum.map or recursion, which are on the functional/declarative side. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4LXruB87p001kVZZ_-PSXX%2BMGxP7sBjyv%2B4zFjK4CsTsw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
