Yes, thanks José. :) On Friday, September 30, 2016 at 5:54:40 PM UTC-4, José Valim wrote: > > That's definitely fair to say, Ben, though I will have to say that as far >> as other functional languages go, Elixir *looks* pretty imperative. :) >> > > You probably mean to say Elixir is *sequential*. Imperative programming > definition focuses a lot on changing the program state, which is something > we minimize in Elixir. For example, using for-loops for mutating an array > is an imperative construct, in Elixir we would use Enum.map or recursion, > which are on the functional/declarative side. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/4aae816e-7337-4165-9fb7-0a7ccb1b0e83%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
